Principles of review

1. Studia Humanistyczne AGH. Społeczeństwo. Kultura. Technologia follows a review process based on double-blind peer review. This means that authors and reviewers do not know each other.

2. If there are doubts about the lack of impartiality in the evaluation of the text due to the identification of the Author(s), the reviewer is obliged to notify the Editorial Board. Then the editors will appoint another reviewer.

3. In case of detection of plagiarism or publication of the same article in another journal, the reviewer is obliged to immediately notify the Editorial Board.

4. The reviewers' comments are intended to improve the quality of the article, to help remove ambiguities and clarify doubts, so they should be factual, specifically point out errors, and shortcomings in the text, as well as not be offensive and malicious.

5. If a review is sent to the editorial office that does not meet the accepted standards, the Editor-in-Chief has the right to ask the reviewer to modify it in accordance with the accepted rules.

6. The reviewer may put anonymously his/her comments on the manuscript in the margin of the reviewed article and attach them to be sent to the Author/Author(s).