Application of seismic refraction methods for rock mass characterization at the lead mine tailings site in Olovo Mine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7494/geol.2026.52.1.87Keywords:
non-destructive methods, applied geophysics, seismic tomography, P-wave velocitiesAbstract
In this study, the application of seismic refraction for the characterization of the rock mass at the lead mine tailings facility in Olovo is presented, with the aim of identifying lithostratigraphic horizons, structural discontinuities, and zones of reduced mechanical resistance that may affect tailings stability. The investigations were conducted along seven seismic profiles of varying lengths and resolutions, designed to cover both shallow and deeper portions of the rock mass to a depth of approximately 60 m. Data processing and interpretation were carried out using the Delta-t-V seismic tomography method, which enables reliable reconstruction of P-wave velocities even under conditions of complex geological structure and velocity inversions. The obtained results indicate pronounced heterogeneity of the rock mass, with clearly differentiated zones of surface embankments and unconsolidated materials (600–1,200 m/s), transitional zones of degraded and karstified rocks (1,800–3,200 m/s), and basal horizons of compact limestone, where P-wave velocities reach values of approximately 4,400 m/s. Particular attention was given to locally developed low-velocity anomalies within deeper horizons, interpreted as karst structures and cavernous zones that are potentially critical for tailings stability. By integrating the individual profiles, a unified 3D rock mass model was developed, enabling spatial analysis of anomalies and reliable terrain zoning. The results confirm that seismic refraction, combined with the Delta-t-V method, represents an efficient, non-destructive, and engineering-relevant tool for characterizing complex tailings rock masses. The developed models have direct application in stability assessment, remediation planning, and the enhancement of mining and environmental safety systems.
Downloads
References
Ackman T.E. & Cohen K.K., 1994. Geophysical methods: Remote techniques applied to mining-related environmental and engineering problems. [in:] International Land Reclamation and Mine Drainage Conference and Third International Conference on the Abatement of Acidic Drainage. Volume 4: Abandoned Mine Lands and Topical Issues, United States Department of the Interior, Pittsburgh, PA, 208–217. https://doi.org/10.21000/JASMR94040208.
Adavi Z., Weber R. & Rohm W., 2022. Pre-analysis of GNSS tomography solution using the concept of spread of model resolution matrix. Journal of Geodesy, 96(4), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01620-1.
Adewoyin O.O., Joshua E.O., Akinyemi M.L., Maxwell O., Aanuoluwa A.T. & Joel E.S., 2021a. Engineering site investigations using surface seismic refraction technique. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 655(1), 012098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/655/1/012098.
Adewoyin O.O., Joshua E.O., Akinyemi M.L., Omeje M. & Adagunodo T.A., 2021b. Evaluation of geotechnical parameters of reclaimed land from near-surface seismic refraction method. Heliyon, 7(4), e06765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06765.
Adewoyin O.O., Joshua E.O., Akinyemi M.L., Omeje M. & Joel E.S., 2021c. Application of seismic refraction in engineering geology. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 655(1), 012102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/655/1/012102.
Akingboye A.S., 2025. Electrical and seismic refraction methods: Fundamental concepts, current trends, and emerging machine learning prospects. Discover Geoscience, 3(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-025-00169-8.
Akingboye A.S. & Ogunyele A.C., 2019. Insight into seismic refraction and electrical resistivity tomography techniques in subsurface investigations. Rudarsko-geološko-naftni zbornik, 34(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.17794/rgn.2019.1.9.
Akinlalu A.A., Futai M.M., Afolabi D.O. & Abraham-A R.M., 2026. A review on the application of geophysical methods in civil engineering studies. Geosystems and Geoenvironment, 5(1), 100453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geogeo.2025.100453.
Allen C.C., Cracknell M.J., Miller C.B., Missen O.P. & Meffre S., 2025. Practical application of geophysical methods for characterisation of waste rock dumps. Mine Water and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-025-01086-5.
Bačić M., Librić L., Kaćunić D.J. & Kovačević M.S., 2020. The usefulness of seismic surveys for geotechnical engineering in karst: Some practical examples. Geosciences, 10(10), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100406.
Bektašević E., Antičević H., Gutić K. & Sikira D., 2024a. Određivanje dubine zone oštećenja stijenske mase oko profila iskopa miniranjem seizmičkom cross-hole tomografijom u tunelu „Šubir” na autocesti Zagreb–Split [Determination of the depth of the rock mass damage zone around the excavation profile by blasting with seismic cross-hole tomography in the “Šubir” tunnel on the Zagreb–Split motorway]. Nauka + Praksa, 27(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.62683/NiP27.13-19.
Bektašević E., Antičević H., Gutić K. & Sikira D., 2024b. Application of seismic methods for determining the depth of the rock mass damage zone around the excavation profile by blasting. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 18(3), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.30574/gjeta.2024.18.3.0051.
Bektašević E., Filipović S., Gutić K. & Musa N., 2025a. Ispitivanje integriteta armiranobetonskih pilota na izlaznom portalu tunela Kobilja Glava nedestruktivnom metodom [Testing the integrity of reinforced concrete piles at the exit portal of the Kobilja Glava tunnel using a non-destructive method]. e-Zbornik: Electronic Collection of Papers of the Faculty of Civil Engineering, 15(29), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.47960/2232-9080.2025.29.15.58.
Bektašević E., Filipović S., Hurlov G. & Gutić K., 2025b. Application of a non-destructive method in the analysis of the homogeneity of a concrete foundation in a tunnel structure. e-Zbornik: Electronic Collection of Papers of the Faculty of Civil Engineering, 15(30), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.47960/2232-9080.2025.30.15.71.
Bektašević E., Strelec S., Sakić N. & Gutić K., 2025c. Multichannel surface wave analysis in the context of shallow geophysical investigations. Academia Engineering, 2(3), 7876. https://doi.org/10.20935/AcadEng7876.
Bektašević E., Mušija A., Gutić K. & Sakić N., 2025d. Application of seismic refraction for determining geomechanical parameters in the excavation zone of the Vranduk tunnel on the Corridor Vc route. [in:] Proceedings of The International Conference Synergy of Architecture & Civil Engineering, SINARG 2025: Niš (Serbia), September 11–12, 2025, University, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, SASA, Branch in Niš, Niš, 513–524. https://doi.org/10.62683/SINARG2025.065.
Bektašević E., Gutić K. & Požegić Z., 2025e. Multidisciplinary analysis of preventive occupational safety measures in tunnel construction. Journal of Industrial Safety, 3(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinse.2025.12.002.
Brom A. & Stan-Kłeczek I., 2015. Comparison of seismic sources for shallow seismic: Sledgehammer and pyrotechnics. Contemporary Trends in Geoscience, 4(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctg-2015-0004.
Cai W., Xiang G., Zhang H. & Li Y., 2014. Application of seismic velocity tomography in underground coal mines: A case study of Yima mining area, Henan, China. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 109, 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.07.021.
Cardarelli E., Cercato M., Cerreto A. & Di Filippo G., 2010. Electrical resistivity and seismic refraction tomography to detect buried cavities. Geophysical Prospecting, 58(4), 685–695. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00854.x.
Cheng N., Ismail M.A.B.M. & Nordiana M.M., 2025. From 2D seismic refraction to 3D subsurface characterization: Unpacking the role of univariate spatial interpolation techniques with borehole validation. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 141, 104113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2025.104113.
CTU IPKIN Ltd. Bijeljina, 2022. Izvještaj rezultata geofizičkih istraživanja u zoni eksploatacijskom polju rudnika olova u Olovu na mikrolokaciji Zone 4 jalovišta u Očeklju. Centar Tehničkich Usluga IPKIN, Bijeljina [unpublished].
Dean T. & Grant M., 2024. A beginner’s guide to seismic sensors. Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 230, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14432471.2024.2395647.
Fisseha S., Mewa G. & Haile T., 2021. Refraction seismic complementing electrical method in subsurface characterization for tunneling in soft pyroclastic: A case study. Heliyon, 7(8), e07680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07680.
Foti S., Lai C.G., Rix G.J. & Strobbia C., 2018. Guidelines for good practice of surface wave analysis. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16(6), 2367–2420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0206-7.
Gebrande H. & Miller H., 1985. Refraktionsseismik. [in:] Angewandte Geowissenschaften. Bd. 2: Methoden der angewandten Geophysik und mathematische Verfahren in den Geowissenschaften, Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, 226–260.
Hanafi L.A., Hardiyatmo H.C. & Faris F., 2025. Liquefaction potential evaluation using near-surface seismic refraction tomography: A case study. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1458(1), 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1458/1/012036.
Herlambang N. & Riyanto A., 2021. Determination of bedrock depth in Universitas Indonesia using the seismic refraction method. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 846(1), 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/846/1/012016.
Hill J., 2025. Seismic refraction surveys: An overview of methods and applications. Douglas Partners. https://www.douglas-partners.com.au/news/seismic-refraction-surveys-an-overview-of-methods-and-applications [access: 3.02.2026].
Idziak A.F. & Dubiel R. (eds.), 2011. Geophysics in Mining and Environmental Protection. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19097-1.
Jian Z., Zhao G., Ma J., Liu L., Liang W. & Wu S., 2025. Detection of rock mass defects using seismic tomography. Applied Sciences, 15(3), 1238. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031238.
Kalashnikova V., Meisingset I., Øverås R. & Krasova D., 2020. High-resolution seismic velocity field estimation techniques and their application to geohazard, lithology and porosity prediction. Near Surface Geophysics, 18(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12083.
Kuehn T., Holt J.W., Johnson R. & Meng T., 2024. Active seismic refraction, reflection, and surface wave surveys in thick debris covered glacial environments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 129(1), e2023JF007304. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JF007304.
Lottermoser B.G., 2010. Mine water. [in:] Lottermoser B.G., Mine Wastes: Characterization, Treatment and Environmental Impacts, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 119–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12419-8.
Maniscalco R., Fazio E., Punturo R., Cirrincione R., Di Stefano A., Distefano S., Forzese M., Lanzafame G., Leonardi G.S., Montalbano S., Pellegrino A.G., Raele A. & Palmeri G., 2022. The porosity in heterogeneous carbonate reservoir rocks: Tectonic versus diagenetic imprint – A multi-scale study from the Hyblean Plateau (SE Sicily, Italy). Geosciences, 12(4), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12040149.
Mollehuara-Canales R., Lghoul M., Kchikach A., Hakkou R. & Guerin R., 2021. Leveraging active-source seismic data in mining tailings: refraction and MASW analysis, elastic parameters, and hydrogeological. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Finland, 93(2), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.17741/bgsf/93.2.002.
Musmann P., 2023. Determination of seismic resolution: Some practical aspects from land seismic data. [in:] GeoBerlin 2023. https://doi.org/10.48380/h6nm-zc18.
Padovan B., Bačić M., Librić L., Mejrušić V. & Kovačević M.S., 2025. Multi-geophysical characterization of karst landfills in Croatia: Mapping the waste–bedrock interface and assessing waste volume. Sustainability, 17(24), 10892. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172410892.
Pegah E. & Liu H., 2016. Application of near surface seismic refraction tomography and multichannel analysis of surface waves for geotechnical site characterizations: A case study. Engineering Geology, 208, 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.04.021.
Sandmeier K.J., 2016. ReflexW version 8.1: Program for processing of seismic, acoustic or electromagnetic reflection, refraction and transmission data [software manual]. Sandmeier Software, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Sheehan J.R., Doll W.E., Watson D.B. & Mandell W.A., 2005. Application of seismic refraction tomography to karst cavities. [in:] U.S. Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings, Rapid City, South Dakota, September 12–15, 2005, Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5160, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, 29–38. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2005/5160/PDF/Part1_2.pdf.
Sheriff R.E. & Geldart L.P., 1995. Exploration Seismology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167932.
Steeples D.W., 2005. Shallow seismic methods. [in:] Rubin Y. & Hubbard S.S. (eds.), Hydrogeophysics, Water Science and Technology Library, 50, Springer, Dordrecht, 215–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3102-5_8.
Sun L., Zhou H.-W., Zou Z., Hu H., Wo Y. & Ding Y., 2025. Quantifiable elements of seismic image fidelity: A tutorial review. Geosciences, 15(12), 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15120445.
Tajudin S.A.A., Abidin M.H.Z., Madun A. & Zawawi M.H., 2016. Barren acidic soil assessment using seismic refraction survey. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 136(1), 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/136/1/012035.
U.S. EPA, 2026. Seismic Refraction. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/environmental-geophysics/seismic-refraction [access: 3.02.2026].
Vick S.G., 1990. Planning, Design, and Analysis of Tailings Dams. BiTech Publishers, Richmond.
Wang H., Wang J., Yin X. & Liang X., 2025. Quantitative hazard assessment of mining-induced seismicity using spatiotemporal b-value dynamics from microseismic monitoring. Applied Sciences, 15(18), 10073. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810073.
Wang Z., Juhlin C., Lü Q., Ruan X., Liu Z., Yu C. & Chen M., 2025. High-resolution seismic reflection surveying to delineate shallow subsurface geological structures in the karst area of Shenzhen, China. Solid Earth, 16(3), 761–773. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-761-2025.
Watts H., Booth A.D., Reinardy B.T.I., Killingbeck S.F., Jansson P., Clark R.A., Chandler B.M.P. & Nesje A., 2022. An assessment of geophysical survey techniques for characterising the subsurface around glacier margins, and recommendations for future applications. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, 734682. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.734682.
Wei W. & Fu L.-Y., 2014. On horizontal resolution for seismic acquisition geometries in complex 3D media. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 108, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.06.011.
Xie L., Wang B., Wang Y., Fang J., Zeng L., Xin G., Shen S. & She Z., 2024. The method for precise seismic detection of geological structures in underground coal mines and application. Frontiers in Earth Science, 12, 1307275. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1307275.
Yilmaz Ö., 2001. Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data (2nd ed.). Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801580.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors have full copyright and property rights to their work. Their copyrights to store the work, duplicate it in printing (as well as in the form of a digital CD recording), to make it available in the digital form, on the Internet and putting into circulation multiplied copies of the work worldwide are unlimited.
The content of the journal is freely available according to the Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
