Non-history-based DEM model for predictions of numerical earthquakes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7494/geol.2025.51.3.255

Keywords:

granular fault gouge, supervised machine learning, Discrete Element Method

Abstract

Stick-slip phenomena roughly describe the behavior of a tectonic fault.
A simplified model of stick-slip events is often assumed in laboratory experiments and numerical simulations of laboratory earthquakes. This work proposes a more advanced approach. The Discrete Element Method (DEM) was used to generate a numerical model for simulating the laboratory earthquakes in which the granular layer was taken into account. The proposed model takes into account an irregular, random pattern of stress increase and decrease in such a system. At 5,000 selected, regularly spaced time points, the so-called “checkpoints”, 25 parameters were measured, describing the average state of all particles forming the numerical fault at a given moment. The created dataset was used to train the Random Forest algorithm, and then, as part of the tests, this algorithm was used to predict subsequent stick-slip events. The algorithm made predictions solely on the basis of information about the current parameters of the particles. Importantly, the predictions made did not use the history of previous stick-slip events. Feature Importance and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used to assess the contribution of individual particle physical parameters to the prediction results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abe S., Boros V., Hancock W. & Weatherley D., 2014. ESyS-Particle Tutorial and User’s Guide. Version 2.3.1. https://launchpad.net/esys-particle [access: 30.06.2025].

Beroza G.C., Segou M. & Mousavi S.M., 2021. Machine learning and earthquake forecasting – next steps. Nature Communications, 12, 4761. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24952-6.

Bolton D.C., Shreedharan S., Rivière J. & Marone C., 2020. Acoustic energy release during the laboratory seismic cycle: Insights on laboratory earthquake precursors and prediction. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125, e2019JB018975. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018975.

Cundall P.A. & Strack O.D.L., 1979. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique, 29(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47.

Dahmen K., Ben-Zion Y. & Uhl J.A., 2011. Simple analytic theory for the statistics of avalanches in sheared granular materials. Nature Physics, 7, 554–557. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1957.

Dorostkar O., 2018. Stick-slip dynamics in dry and fluid saturated granular fault gouge investigated by numerical simulations. ETH Zürich [PhD thesis]. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000283977.

Ferdowsi B., 2014. Discrete element modeling of triggered slip in faults with granular gouge: Application to dynamic earthquake triggering. ETH Zürich [PhD thesis]. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-010232908.

Géron A., 2019. Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow. 2nd ed. O’Reilly Media, Inc, Sebastopol, CA.

Huang W., Gao K. & Feng Y., 2024. Predicting stick-slips in sheared granular fault using machine learning, optimized dense fault dynamics data. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(2), 246. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12020246.

Kanamori H. & Anderson D.L., 1975. Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 65(5), 1073–1095.

Kubo H., Naoi M. & Kano M., 2024. Recent advances in earthquake seismology using machine learning. Earth, Planets and Space, 76(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-024-01982-0.

Li C.-Q. & Zhou X.-P., 2021. Laboratory earthquake prediction of granite. Tribology International, 160, 107003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2021.107003.

Li C.-Q. & Zhou X.-P., 2022. Visualization of stick-slip shear failure process of granite by 3D reconstruction technique and DEM. Tribology International, 176, 107923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2022.107923.

Liu Y.H., 2020. Python Machine Learning by Example: Build Intelligent Systems Using Python, TensorFlow 2, PyTorch, and Scikit-Learn. 3rd ed. Packt Publishing, Birmingham.

Ma G., Mei J., Gao K., Zhao J., Zhou W. & Wang D., 2022. Machine learning bridges microslips and slip avalanches of sheared granular gouges. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 579, 117366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117366.

Mollon G., Aubry J. & Schubnel A., 2023. Laboratory earthquakes simulations – typical events, fault damage, and gouge production. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 128, e2022JB025429. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB025429.

Muto J., Nakatani T., Nishikawa O. & Nagahama H., 2015. Fractal particle size distribution of pulverized fault rocks as a function of distance from the fault core. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(10), 3811–3819. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064026.

O’Sullivan C., 2011. Particulate Discrete Element Modelling: A Geomechanics Perspective. CRC Press, London.

O’Sullivan C. & Bray J.D., 2004. Selecting a suitable time step for discrete element simulations that use the central difference time integration scheme. Engineering Computations, 21(2–4), 278–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644400410519794.

Prieto G.A., Shearer P.M., Vernon F.L. & Kilb D., 2004. Earthquake source scaling and self-similarity estimation from stacking P and S spectra. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109(B8), B08310. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003084.

Raschka S. & Mirjalili V., 2019. Python Machine Learning: Machine Learning and Deep Learning with Python, Scikit-Learn, and TensorFlow 2. 3rd ed. Packt Publishing, Birmingham.

Ren C.X., Dorostkar O., Rouet-Leduc B., Hulbert C., Strebel D., Guyer R.A., Johnson P.A. & Carmeliet J., 2019. Machine learning reveals the state of intermittent frictional dynamics in a sheared granular fault. Geophysical Research Letters, 46(13), 7395–7403. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082706.

Rivière J., Lv Z., Johnson P.A. & Marone C., 2018. Evolution of b-value during the seismic cycle: Insights from laboratory experiments on simulated faults. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 482, 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.11.036.

Rouet-Leduc B., Hulbert C., Lubbers N., Barros K., Humphreys C.J. & Johnson P.A., 2017. Machine learning predicts laboratory earthquakes. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(18), 9276–9282. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074677.

Senatorski P., 2023. Sejsmiczność, trzęsienia ziemi i lingwistyka [Seismicity, earthquakes and linguistics]. Przegląd Geofizyczny, 68(3–4), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.32045/PG-2023-042.

Štrumbelj E. & Kononenko I., 2014. Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions. Knowledge and Information Systems, 41(3), 647–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-013-0679-x.

Wang Y.C., 2009. A new algorithm to model the dynamics of 3-D bonded rigid bodies with rotations. Acta Geotechnica, 4(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-008-0072-1.

Wang Y., Abe S., Latham S. & Mora P., 2006. Implementation of particle-scale rotation in the 3-D lattice solid model. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 163(9), 1769–1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-006-0096-0.

Weatherley D.K., Boros V.E., Hancock W.R. & Abe S., 2010. Scaling benchmark of ESyS-Particle for elastic wave propagation simulations. [in:] Proceedings 2010 Sixth IEEE International Conference on E-Science: EScience 2010: 7–10 December 2010, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, IEEE, Piscataway, 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1109/eScience.2010.40.

Zhou X., Ma W., Yang L., Bi J. & Cheng H., 2018. Experimental study of stick-slip failure processes and effect of physical properties on stick-slip behavior. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 123(1), 653–673. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014515.

Zhou X., He Y. & Shou Y., 2021. Experimental investigation of the effects of loading rate, contact roughness, and normal stress on the stick-slip behavior of faults. Tectonophysics, 816, 229027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2021.229027.

Zhou X.-P., Li C.-Q. & Tu D., 2023. Evolution of the full-interface shear stress of a fault during frictional instability. Tribology International, 182, 108350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2023.108350.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Klejment, P. (2025). Non-history-based DEM model for predictions of numerical earthquakes. Geology, Geophysics and Environment, 51(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.7494/geol.2025.51.3.255