The estimation of an anthropogenic depth boundary using the magnetic susceptibility method in Kogi State, North-Central Nigeria

Authors

  • Solomon Sunday Jatto Space Environment Research Laboratory National Space Research and Development Agency Airport Road Abuja
  • Kizito O Musa Department of Geology Federal University, Lokoja,
  • Usikalu R. Mojisola Covenant University. Ota

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7494/geol.2020.46.1.49

Keywords:

magnetic susceptibility, anthropogenic, pollutants, soil profiles, Central Nigeria

Abstract

Magnetic susceptibility measurements remain one of the most reliable methods used to investigate the pollution of both surface and subsurface soil from metallic anthropogenic sources. Most of the geological rocks within the study area increase the susceptibility of the soil; however, knowing the natural background susceptibility of the parent rocks will give an idea of the anthropogenic influence on the susceptibility of the soil. This study was carried out in Kogi State, North Central Nigeria, with the aim of determining the depth of the boundary between the anthropogenic influences on soil magnetic susceptibility from those of a lithogenic origin. Magnetic susceptibility measurements were carried out on 1,760 soil samples, collected from 220 soil profiles at a depth of 80.0 cm and at intervals of 10.0 cm. From the spatial distribution of magnetic susceptibility maps at different depths, the boundary between the basement complex and the sedimentary basin was clearly demarcated. The result further shows the highest magnetic susceptibility values of 350–650 × 10−5 SI, which dominates the surface soil to a depth of 40.0 cm. At the depth of 40–50 cm, the result indicates the combination of a natural anthropogenic influence on soil magnetic susceptibility with an average of 250 × 10−5 SI. Furthermore, no evidence of layering along the depth sections was observed, suggesting that the soil profiles indicate areas mainly covered by anthropogenically influenced susceptibility, which were localized and restricted to commercial places within the state. This study reveals that the average depth of soil affected by anthropogenic pollutants is between 40–50 cm in commercial places and 20–30 cm in other places with less commercial activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Solomon Sunday Jatto, Space Environment Research Laboratory National Space Research and Development Agency Airport Road Abuja
    Department of Atmospheric Chemistry and Environmental Research Senior Scientific Officer
  • Kizito O Musa, Department of Geology Federal University, Lokoja,
    Department of Geology/Senior Lecturer
  • Usikalu R. Mojisola, Covenant University. Ota
    Department of Physics/Asso. Prof

References

Anagnostopoulou M.A. & Day J.P., 2006. Lead concentrations and isotope ratios in street dust in major cities in Greece in relation to the use of lead in petrol. Science of the Total Environment, 367(2–3), 791–799.

Banerjee A.D.K., 2003. Heavy metal levels and solid phase speciation in street dusts of Delhi, India. Environmental Pollution, 123(1), 95–105.

Booth C.A., Shilton V., Fullen M.A., Walden J., Worsley A.T. & Power A.L., 2006. Environmental magnetism: measuring, monitoring and modelling urban street dust pollution. [in:] Longhurst J.W.S. & Brebbia C.A. (eds.), Air Pollution XIV, Wessex Institute of Technology (WIT) Press, Southampton, 333–342.

Boyko T., Scholger R. & Stanjek H., 2004. Topsoil magnetic susceptibility mapping as a tool for pollution monitoring: repeatability of in situ measurements. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 55, 249–259.

Chaparro M.A.E., Gogorza C.S.G., Irurzun M.A. & Sinito A.M., 2006. Review of magnetism and heavy metal pollution studies of various environments in Argentina. Earth Planets Space, 58(10), 1411–1422.

Charlesworth S., Everett M., McCarthy R., Ordonez A. & De Miguel E.A., 2003. Comparative study of heavy metal concentration and distribution in deposited street dusts in a large and a small urban area: Birmingham and Coventry, West Midlands, UK. Environmental International, 29, 563–573.

Dearing J.A., Hay K., Baban S., Huddleston A.S., Wellington E.M.H. & Loveland P.J., 1996. Magnetic susceptibility of topsoils: a test of conflicting theories using a national database. Geophysical Journal International, 127, 728–734.

D’Emilio M., Chianese D., Coppola R., Macchiato M. & Ragosta M., 2007. Magnetic susceptibility measurements as proxy method to monitor soil pollution: development of experimental protocols for field surveys. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 125, 137–146, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9246-1.

Fatoye F.B. & Gideon N.D., 2014. Geology and mineral resources of the Lower Benue Trough, Nigeria. Advances in Applied Science Research Journal, 4(6), 21–28.

Gautam P., Blaha U. & Appel E., 2005. Magnetic susceptibility of dust-loaded leaves as a proxy of traffic-related heavy metal pollution in Kathmandu City, Nepal. Atmospheric Environment, 39(12), 2201–2211.

Georgeaud V.M., Rochette P., Ambrosi J.P., Vandamme D. & Williamson D., 1997. Relationship between heavy metals and magnetic properties in a large polluted catchment: the Etang de Berre (South of France). Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 22(1–2), 211–214.

Hanesch M & Scholger R., 2005. The Influence of soil type on the magnetic susceptibility measured throughout soil profiles. Geophysical Journal International, 161(1), 50–56.

Haugland T., Ottesen R.T. & Volde T., 2007. Lead and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in surface soil from day care centres in the city of Bergen, Norway. Environmental Pollution, 153(2), 266–272.

Jatto S.S., Peter O.S. & Ahmed A.L., 2016. 3-dimensional surface magnetic susceptibility distribution with depth to investigate anthropogenic pollutants boundary in Abuja Metropolis. Geology, Geophysics and Environment, 42(4), 443–448.

Jordanova N., Jordanova D. & Tsacheva T., 2008. Application of magnetometry for delineation of anthropogenic pollution in areas covered by various soil types. Geoderma, 144(3–4), 557–571.

Kanu M.O., Meludu O.C. & Oniku S.A., 2013. A preliminary assessment of soil pollution in some parts of Jalingo Metropolis, Nigeria using magnetic susceptibility method. The Jordan Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 5(2), 53–61.

Kapička A., Petrovský E., Jordanova N. & Podrázský V., 2001. Magnetic properties of forest top soils in Krkonose Mountains, Czech Republic. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part A: Solid Earth and Geodesy, 26, 917–922.

Kim W., Doh S.J., Park Y.H. & Yun S.T., 2007. Two-year magnetic monitoring in conjunction with geochemical and electron microscopic data of roadside dust in Seoul, Korea. Atmospheric Environment, 41, 7627–7641.

Knab M., Appel E. & Hoffmann V., 2001. Separation of the anthropogenic portion of heavy metal contents along a highway by means of magnetic susceptibility and fuzzy c-means cluster analysis. European Journal of Environmental Engineering and Geophysics, 6, 125–140.

KSMSMD, 2004. Guide to Investment Opportunities in the Solid Minerals Sector of Kogi State. Kogi State Ministry of Solid Minerals Development.

Lu S. & Bai S., 2008. Magnetic characterization and magnetic mineralogy of the Hangzhou urban soils and its environmental implications. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 51(3), 549–557.

Magiera T., Stryszcz Z., Kapička A. & Petrovský E., 2006. Discrimination of lithogenic and anthropogenic influences on topsoil magnetic susceptibility in Central Europe. Geoderma, 130, 299–311.

NGSA, 2009. Geological Map of Kogi State. Nigerian Geological Survey Agency.

Obaje N.G., Moumouni A., Goki N.G. & Chaanda M S., 2011. Stratigraphy, paleogeography and hydrocarbon resource potentials of the Bida Basin in North-Central Nigeria. Journal of Mining and Geology, 47(2), 97–114.

Obiora D.N., Yakubu J.A. & Okeke F.N., 2016. Interpretation of aeromagnetic data of Idah area in North Central, Nigeria using combined methods. Journal of Geology Society, India, 88, 98–106, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594- 016-0462-1

Petrovský E. & Ellwood B.B., 1999. Magnetic monitoring of pollution of air, land and waters. [in:] Maher B.A. & Thompson R. (eds.), Quaternary Climates, Environments and Magnetism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 279–322.

Petrovský E., Hulka Z. & Kapička A., 2010. A new tool for in situ measurements of the vertical distribution of magnetic susceptibility in soils as basis for mapping deposited dust. Journal of Environmental Technology, 25(9), 1021–1029.

Sarris A., Kokkinou E., Aidona E., Kallithrakas-Kontos N., Koulouridakis P., Droulia K. & Damianovits O., 2009. Environmental study for pollution in the area of Megalopolis power plant in the wide area of the power plant of Megalopolis (Peloponnesus, Greece). Environmental Geology, 58, 1769–1783.

Sutherland R.A. & Tolosa C.A., 2000. Multi-element analysis of road-deposited sediment in an urban drainage basin, Honolulu, Hawaii. Environmental Pollution, 110(3), 483–495.

Yang T., Liu Q., Li H., Zeng Q. & Chan L., 2010. Anthropogenic magnetic particles and heavy metals in the road dust: magnetic identification and its implications. Atmospheric Environment, 44(9), 1175–1185.

Yin J., Allen A.G., Harrison R.M., Jennings S.G., Wright E., Fitzpatrick M., Healy T., Barry E., Ceburnis D. & McCusker D., 2005. Major component composition of urban PM10 and PM2.5 in Ireland. Atmospheric Research, 78(3–4), 149–165.

Zananiri I., Kondopoulou D. & Spassov S., 2010. The application of environmental magnetism techniques for pollution assessment in urban and suburban areas of Greece: state of the art and case studies. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, 43(4), 1972–1982.

Zawadzki J., Magiera T., Fabijańczyk P. & Kusza G., 2012. Geostatistical 3-dimensional integration of measurements of soil magnetic susceptibility. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184(5), 3267–3278.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The estimation of an anthropogenic depth boundary using the magnetic susceptibility method in Kogi State, North-Central Nigeria. (2020). Geology, Geophysics and Environment, 46(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.7494/geol.2020.46.1.49