A PROPOSITION OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY FOR THE PURPOSE OF REASONING WITH THE USE OF AN UPPER-ONTOLOGY

Authors

  • Kamil Szymański AGH University of Science and Technology
  • Grzegorz Dobrowolski AGH University of Science and Technology
  • Jarosław Koźlak AGH University of Science and Technology
  • Anna Zygmunt AGH University of Science and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7494/csci.2007.8.3.117

Keywords:

ontology, knowledge management, ontology integration, upper-ontology, reasoning

Abstract

This article describes a proposition of knowledge organization for the purpose of reasoningusing an upper-ontology. It presents a model of integrated ontologies architecture whichconsists of a domain ontologies layer with instances, a shared upper-ontology layer withadditional rules and a layer of ontologies mapping concrete domain ontologies with the upperontology.Thanks to the upper-ontology, new facts were concluded from domain ontologiesduring the reasoning process. A practical realization proposition is given as well. It is basedon some popular SemanticWeb technologies and tools, such as OWL, SWRL, nRQL, Prot´eg´eand Racer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Kamil Szymański, AGH University of Science and Technology

Institute of Computer Science

Grzegorz Dobrowolski, AGH University of Science and Technology

Institute of Computer Science

Jarosław Koźlak, AGH University of Science and Technology

Institute of Computer Science

Anna Zygmunt, AGH University of Science and Technology

Institute of Computer Science

References

Baader F. et al.: The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, 2003

Euzenat J., Le Bach T., Barrasa J., Bouquet P., De Bo J., Dieng R., Ehrig M., Hauswirth M., Jarrar M., Lara R., Maynard D., Napoli A., Stamou G., Stuckenschmidt H., Shvaiko P., Tessaris S., Van Acker S., Zaihrayeu I.: State of the art on ontology alignment. Knowledge Web Deliverable, Technical Report, INRIA,

Fridman N., Musen M.: SMART: Automated Support for Ontology Merging and Alignment. TwelthWorkshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, Banff, Canada, 1999

Gruber T.: What is an Ontology.

http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/kst/what-is-an-ontology.html

Haase P., Motik B.: A Mapping System for the Integration of OWL-DL Ontologies. IHIS’05, Bremen, November 2005

Haarslev V., Moller R.: RACER User’s Guide and Reference Manual. 2004

HorridgeM., Knublauch H. et al.: A Practical Guide To Building Ontologies Using The Protege-OWL Plugin and CO-ODE Tools, 1st ed., University of Manchester, 2004

Horrocks I., van Harmelen F., Patel-Schneider P. et al.: DAML+OIL. http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index.html, 2001

Hunter J.: The Semantic Web. 2002

Kalfoglou Y., Schorlemmer M.: Ontology Mapping: The State of the Art. The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 18:1, 2003, 1–31

Knublauch H.: The Prot´eg´e-OWL API – Programmer’s Guide. Stanford Medical Informatics, 2005

Lee T.B., Hendler J., Lassila O.: Semantic Web. 2001

LISP. http://www.lisp.org/alu/home

Łuszpaj A., Szymański K., Zygmunt A., Koźlak J.: The Process of Integrating Ontologies for Knowledge Base Systems. 7th Software Engineering Conference, Cracow 2005

McGuinness D. L., van Harmelen F.: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/, W3C Recommendation, 2004

Namyoun C., Il-Yeol S., Hyoil H.: A Survey on Ontology Mapping. SIGMOD Record, Vol. 35, No. 3, Sep. 2006

Niles I., Pease A.: Towards a Standard Upper Ontology. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems. FOIS-2001

Pazienza M. T., Stellato A. et al.: Ontology Mapping to support ontology-based question answering. 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-2005) Galway, Ireland, November, 2005

Pinto H. S., Martins J.P.: Ontology Integration – How to perform the process. Portugal 2001

Pinto H. S., Martins J.P.: Some Issues on Ontology Integration. Portugal 2001

Racer Systems. http://www.racer-systems.com/

Resource Description Framework (RDF). http://www.w3.org/RDF

RICE. http://www.ronaldcornet.nl/rice/

Standard Upper Ontology Working Group (SUO WG). http://suo.ieee.org/index.html

Standard Upper Ontology Working Group (SUO WG) Suggested Upper Merged Ontology. http://suo.ieee.org/SUO/SUMO/index.html

SUMO Ontology. http://ontology.teknowledge.com/

Tamma V.: An Ontology Model Supporting Multiple Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing. Thesis of University of Liverpool, 2001

The New Racer Query Language.

http://www.cs.concordia.ca/~haarslev/racer/racer-queries.pdf

W3C: SWRL – A Semantic Web Rule Language. 2004

Welcome to the Prot´eg´e Project. http://protege.stanford.edu/

Downloads

Published

2013-04-20

How to Cite

Szymański, K., Dobrowolski, G., Koźlak, J., & Zygmunt, A. (2013). A PROPOSITION OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY FOR THE PURPOSE OF REASONING WITH THE USE OF AN UPPER-ONTOLOGY. Computer Science, 8(3), 117. https://doi.org/10.7494/csci.2007.8.3.117

Issue

Section

Articles