The Human Translator: Expertise and Uncertainty in the Age of Automated Digital Advertisingenvironmental storytelling in art installation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7494/human.2025.24.2.7835

Keywords:

PPC (Pay-Per-Click), algorithmic opacity, black box, epistemic practice, algorithmic accountability, tacit knowledge, digital labor, community of practice

Abstract

This article analyzes the fundamental transformation of the work of Pay-Per-Click (PPC) specialists in the context of increasing automation and algorithmic opacity (the so-called “black box”) in digital advertising. Based on a qualitative ethnographic study, the article explores how practitioners negotiate responsibility and expertise under conditions of systemic uncertainty. The findings indicate that the work of PPC specialists is evolving from a purely technical role into an interpretive and epistemic practice. Specialists are increasingly functioning as interpreters of algorithmic decisions, explaining their results to clients and managers in an effort to maintain the appearance of control over systems whose internal logic remains hidden. Tacit knowledge, based on intuition, emotional experience, and the collective construction of meaning within communities of practitioners (e.g., on forums), proves to be crucial to their functioning. This article introduces and develops the concept of algorithmic accountability as an epistemic practice—the everyday effort to make sense of, justify, and explain automated decisions in the face of structural ignorance.
 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ananny M., Crawford K., „Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability”. New Media & Society 20, 3 (2018), s. 973–989. doi: 10.1177/1461444816676645, Źródło: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645, dostęp: 05.12.2025

2. Beck U., Giddens A., Scott Lash. Modernizacja refleksyjna. Warszawa: 2009.

3. Beck U., Społeczeństwo ryzyka. Warszawa: 2002.

4. Beck U., Społeczeństwo światowego ryzyka. Warszawa: 2012.

5. Beck U., Władza i przeciwwładza w epoce globalnej. Warszawa: 2005.

6. Burrell J., „How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms”. Big Data & Society 3, 1 (2016), s. 1–12. doi: 10.1177/2053951715622512, Źródło: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2660674, dostęp: 05.12.2025

7. Knorr-Cetina K., Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999. Źródło: https://revistaredes.unq.edu.ar/index.php/redes/article/view/721, dostęp: 05.12.2025

8. Latour B., Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987. Źródło: https://www.academia.edu/5409673/SCIENCE_IN_ACTION_How_to_follow_scientists_and_engineers_through_society, dostęp: 05.12.2025

9. Markham A., Buchanan B., AoIR Guidelines for Ethical Internet Research. 2012. Źródło: https://pure.au.dk/ws/files/55543125/UN%20Declaration%20of%20Human%20Rights, dostęp: 05.12.2025

10. Pasquale F., The Black Box Society. The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015.

11. Polanyi M., The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge, 1966.

12. Seaver N „Algorithms as Culture: Some Tactics for the Ethnography of Algorithmic Systems”. Big Data & Society 4, 2 (2017)., doi: 10.1177/2053951717738104. Źródło: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717738104, dostęp: 05.12.2025.

13. Strauss A., Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1978.

14. Suchman L., Human–Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Źródło: https://seeingcollaborations.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/suchman_humanmachinereconfigurations.pdf, dostęp: 05.12.2025

Additional Files

Published

2026-02-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Chrobak, N. (2026). The Human Translator: Expertise and Uncertainty in the Age of Automated Digital Advertisingenvironmental storytelling in art installation. Contribution to Humanities, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.7494/human.2025.24.2.7835