Numerical Optimization of Investment‑Cast Wheel Components for Drone Applications using MAGMASOFT®

Authors

  • Joshua Jonthala TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg image/svg+xml
  • Janusz Lelito AGH University of Krakow image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7494/jcme.2026.10.2.%25p

Keywords:

thin-walled casting, investment casting, numerical simulation, IN713 superalloy, shrinkage porosity, solidification

Abstract

Investment casting technology of thin‑walled components for drone applications requires precise filling and solidification control to minimise porosity and ensure structural integrity. Porosity is one of the most common defects found in castings, and its prediction and analysis are essential for improving the quality of complex superalloy components. In this work, porosity-related defects were examined using the MAGMASOFT® 6.1 numerical simulation software for casting, focusing on the filling and solidification behaviour of an investment casting wheel body component in drone applications. A series of simulations were performed, and two design and simulation versions were developed, analysed and compared.
The wheel body component selected for this work is made of IN713 superalloy. The numerical modelling included the assessment of porosity distribution, hot spot formation, filling behaviour, cooling, and solidification patterns. Fifteen combinations of alloy and shell initial temperatures were evaluated to determine the most favourable thermal conditions for reducing porosity, considering the specific geometry and casting characteristics of the wheel. Based on the initial results, the casting design was modified by adjusting the runner geometry and assembly configuration.
This study introduces a two-stage simulation approach to optimise porosity reduction. The second version of the simulations demonstrated a noticeable reduction in pores, particularly in critical regions of the wheel body. The findings can support drone component manufacturers in improving casting reliability. The results confirm that simulation-driven optimisation of the casting design and thermal parameters can significantly improve the quality of the components produced by investment casting technology.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Joshua Jonthala, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg

    Masters Student

  • Janusz Lelito, AGH University of Krakow

    Dr hab. inz., Professor AGH

References

[1] Green Spikesley E. (1979). Investment casting. International Journal of Materials in Engineering Applications, 1(6), 328–334.

[2] Sjöberg G. (2010). Casting superalloys for structural applications. In: E.A. Loria (Ed.), Superalloy 718 and Derivatives (pp. 116–130). Warrendale: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society.

[3] Stefanescu D.M. (2015). Science and Engineering of Casting Solidification. Cham: Springer.

[4] Sims C.T. (1966). A contemporary view of nickel base superalloys. Journal of the Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 18(10), 1119–1130.

[5] Zýka J., Andršová I., Podhorná B. & Hrbáček K. (2014). Mechanical properties and microstructure of IN738LC nickel superalloy castings. Materials Science Forum, Vol. 782, 437–440. Stafa Zurich: Trans Tech Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.782.437.

[6] Moreira M.F., Fantin L.B., Beneduce Neto F. & Azevedo C.R.F. (2021). Microstructural and mechanical characterization of as cast nickelbased superalloy IN 713C. International Journal of Metalcasting, 15(4), 1129–1148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00540-0.

[7] Rakoczy Ł., Grudzień Rakoczy M. & Cygan R. (2019). The influence of shell mold composition on the as cast macro and micro structure of thin walled IN713C superalloy castings. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 28(7), 3974–3985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-019-04098-9.

[8] Varfolomeev M.S. & Shcherbakova G.I. (2021). Interaction of a ceramic casting mold material of the Al2O3–Al2O3 composition with a nickel-based superalloy. International Journal of Metalcasting, 15(4), 1309–1316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00557-5.

[9] Dave I.B. & Kaila V.N. (2014). Optimization of ceramic shell mold materials in investment casting. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 3(10), 30–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2014.0310005.

[10] Banks J. (2000). Introduction to simulation. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, December 10–13, Orlando, USA (pp. 9–16). Piscataway: IEEE.

[11] Campbell J. (2015). Complete Casting Handbook: Metal Casting Processes, Metallurgy, Techniques and Design. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.

[12] Socha L., Gryc K., Sviželová J., Chmiel M., Brathová M. & Filipek S. (2022). Prediction of defects of ductile iron casting by numerical simulation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1243(1), 012008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1243/1/012008.

[13] Khan M.A.A. & Sheikh A.K. (2018). Mechanical characterization and quality of iron castings using optimized mold design: simulations and experimental validation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 98(1), 799–809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/00170-018-2325-y.

[14] Sabau A.S. (2005). Numerical simulation of the investment casting process. Transactions of American Foundry Society, 113, 407–417.

[15] MAGMA Gießereitechnologie GmbH. (2026). MAGMASOFT®: Investment Casting Module. Aachen: MAGMA Gießereitechnologie GmbH.

[16] Incropera F.P., DeWitt D.P., Bergman T.L. & Lavine A.S. (1996). Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. New York: Wiley.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-18

Issue

Section

Orginal Articles

How to Cite

Jonthala, J. S. I., & Lelito, J. (2026). Numerical Optimization of Investment‑Cast Wheel Components for Drone Applications using MAGMASOFT®. Journal of Casting & Materials Engineering, 10(2), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.7494/jcme.2026.10.2.%p