Integration of Quality Planning with the ProductDevelopment Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7494/dmms.2026.20.1.7798Keywords:
advanced product quality planning (APQP), process integration, knowledge management, maturity-oriented assessmentAbstract
Quality planning is a key element of product development, especially in automotive projects governed by Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) reference logic. The literature indicates that the main research gap is not the absence of APQP or quality planning methods, but the lack of a dedicated approach for assessing how mature APQP-oriented quality planning is cascaded and embedded across organisational layers. This article develops a conceptual model linking product development with product and process quality planning at the strategic, process, and operational levels. The study is based on a literature review, gap analysis, system analysis, and conceptual modelling. The contribution is the development of a three-layer integration model and the Quality Planning Integration Maturity Index (QPIMI), a matrix-based tool for maturity-oriented assessment. QPIMI is proposed as a complementary diagnostic layer, not as an alternative to APQP. The approach supports evidence-based self-assessment and provides a basis for further empirical validation.
References
AIAG. (2024). Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP). 3rd Edition Reference Manual. Southfield: Automotive Industry Action Group. URL: https://www.aiag.org/training-and-resources/manuals/details/APQP-3 [21.06.2026].
Becker J., Knackstedt R. & Pöppelbuß J. (2009). Developing maturity models for IT management – A procedure model and its application. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(3), pp. 213–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-009-0044-5.
de Bruin T., Freeze R., Kulkarni U. & Rosemann M. (2005). Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. In: ACIS 2005 Proceedings – 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. URL: https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2005/109/ [21.06.2026].
Chiliban B., Baral L.M. & Kifor C.V. (2014). Knowledge management platform in Advanced Product Quality Planning. Acta Universitatis Cibiniensis. Technical Series, 65(1), pp. 20–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/aucts-2015-0004.
Foster S.T. (2017). Managing Quality: Integrating the Supply Chain. 6th Edition, Global Edition. Harlow: Pearson. URL: https://search.worldcat.org/title/934196387 [21.06.2026].
Gonzalez-Aleu F., Van Aken E.M., Cross J. & Glover W.J. (2018). Continuous improvement project within Kaizen: Critical success factors in hospitals. The TQM Journal, 30(4), pp. 335–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2017-0175.
Hammer M. (2007). The process audit. Harvard Business Review, 85(4), pp. 111–123. URL: https://hbr.org/2007/04/the-process-audit [21.06.2026].
ISO. (2018). ISO 9004:2018. Quality management – Quality of an organization – Guidance to achieve sustained success. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/70397.html [21.06.2026].
Kurniati N., Yeh R.-H. & Lin J.-J. (2015). Quality inspection and maintenance: The framework of interaction. Procedia Manufacturing, 4, pp. 244–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.11.038.
Röglinger M., Pöppelbuß J. & Becker J. (2012). Maturity models in business process management. Business Process Management Journal, 18(2), pp. 328–346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151211225225.
Roszak M. (2016). Zarządzanie wiedzą jako czynnik kształtujący wartość dodaną organizacji. In: Rosak-Szyrocka J., Sokół A. & Roszak M. (red.), Materialne i niematerialne źródła tworzenia wartości – wybrane zagadnienia z zarządzania i ekonomii. Celje: Faculty of Logistics, University of Maribor; Częstochowa: Faculty of Management, Częstochowa University of Technology. URL: https://sb.nuk.uni-lj.si/Outputs.aspx?cobissid=287078656&type=sutrs [24.06.2026].
Roszak M.T. & Jonda E. (2020). Kryterium doskonalenia w zarządzaniu a proces uczenia się – propozycja ujęcia modelowego. In: Skrzypek E. (red.), Jakość szansą na lepszy świat – uwarunkowania i konsekwencje. Lublin: Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie, pp. 106–119. URL: https://omega.polsl.pl/info/article/PSL38ba3a9a09ac485aa21b8f1ff709f290/ [14.08.2026].
Rudolf Ł. & Roszak M. (2024). Efficiency of the product-development process as a factor determining the effectiveness of implementation for subsequent project phases ACC APQP. Materials and Technology, 58(3), pp. 429–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17222/mit.2023.1085.
Siwczyk A. & Roszak M.T. (2021). Wiedza – potencjał w zarządzaniu procesem technologicznym. Przyczynek do badań. In: Skrzypek E. (red.), Modele organizacyjne w warunkach rewolucji przemysłowej 4.0. Lublin: Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, pp. 197–204. URL: https://omega.polsl.pl/info/article/PSLcb7dfdd0709b48ec9d44f664afe6efdd/ [14.08.2026].
Suárez E., Calvo-Mora A. & Roldán J.L. (2016). The role of strategic planning in excellence management systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), pp. 532–542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.008.
Tang H. (2021). Quality Planning and Assurance: Principles, Approaches, and Methods for Product and Service Development. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119819301.
Tarhan A., Turetken O. & Reijers H.A. (2016). Business process maturity models: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 75, pp. 122–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.01.010.
VDA. (2022). Maturity Level Assurance for New Parts: Methods, Measurement Criteria, Documentation. 3rd revised Edition. Berlin: Verband der Automobilindustrie e.V. URL: https://webshop.vda.de/QMC/de/maturity-level-assurance_062022 [21.06.2026].
Wang K.-J., Jha V.S., Gong D.-C., Hou T.-C. & Chiu C.-C. (2010). Agent-based knowledge management system with APQP: Implementation of semiconductor manufacturing services industry. International Journal of Production Research, 48(10), pp. 2913–2936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540802620746.
Weckenmann A., Akkasoglu G. & Werner T. (2015). Quality management – History and trends. The TQM Journal, 27(3), pp. 281–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2013-0125.
Wolniak R. (2018). The use of QFD method advantages and limitation. Production Engineering Archives, 18, pp. 14–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2018.18.02.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
