Solidification Process Modeling of Equiaxed Investment Castings with Transient Nonuniform Boundary Condition Definition

Authors

  • Weston Olson Casting Simulation Engineer
  • Michael Stemmler Siemens Energy
  • Erik Fernandez University of Central Florida
  • Jayanta Kapat University of Central Florida

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7494/jcme.2024.8.1.1

Keywords:

Solidification process modeling, casting simulation, nickel-based superalloy, equiaxed investment casting, large gas turbine hardware, ransient anisotropic heat transfer, natural convection, ProCAST

Abstract

The equiaxed investment casting process is a multi-physics problem which requires knowledge from engineers who have expertise in materials, metallurgy, fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, and heat transfer. Process modeling is a tool used by foundries to help predict casting defects such as shrinkage porosity, hot tears, and poor grain structure. The reliability of these predictions is strongly dependent on the accuracy of the thermal boundary conditions set in the model. In this work, a SGT5-2000E Vane 4 cast in Rene 80 nickel-based superalloy was modeled, using the FEA simulation package ProCAST, with two different methodologies. One methodology had very little effort invested into defining the thermal domain. The other methodology involved a thorough consideration of all heat transfer mechanisms acting on the mold. An extensive literature search was performed to define a unique natural convection heat transfer coefficient for each set of surfaces on the mold. The transient boundary layer development was also captured in the definition of the heat conditions. The shrinkage porosity predictions of the models were compared to real-world x-ray data and the transient nonuniform methodology predictions were much more representative than the low fidelity heat transfer methodology predictions. The low fidelity heat transfer model did predict some shrinkage, but not where it appeared in reality. The process modeler will be misdirected by the model results when deriving a solution to the casting process if the real-world physics are not appropriately accounted for in the model. This will be very counterproductive when the foundry is using the model to reduce developmental trials by running trials in model space. References and derived parameters are provided for material properties, emissivity of shell and insulation wraps, and external mold spatially varying heat transfer coefficients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zhang W., Xie G., & Zhang D. (2010). Application of an optimization method and experiment in inverse determination of interfacial heat transfer coefficients in the blade casting process. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 34(8), 1068–1076. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2010.03.009.

Szeliga D., Kubiak K., Ziaja W., Cygan R., Suchy J.S., Burbelko A., Nowak W.J. & Sieniawski J. (2017). Investigation of casting-ceramic shell mold interface thermal resistance during solidification process of nickel based superalloy. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 87, 149–160. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.04.024.

Sahai V. & Overfelt R. (1995). Contact conductance simulation for alloy 718 investment castings of various geometries. Transactions of the American Foundrymen’s Society, 103, 627–632.

Yang L., Chai L.H., Zhang L.Q. & Lin J. (2013). Numerical simulation and process optimization of investment casting of the blades for high Nb containing TiAl alloy. Materials Science Forum, 747–748, 105–110. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.747-748.105.

Lenda O.B., Tara A., Jbara O., & Saad E. (2019). Numerical simulation of investment casting process of nickel-based alloy. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, Vol. 286, p. 03005. EDP Sciences.

Miao L., Tang Z., Zhang D., Meng F., Wang J. & Li X. (2021). Investment casting simulation and analysis of shell AlSi11 alloy part. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2002(1), 012040.

Liao Q., Ge P., Lu G., Yang S., Ye W., Gao J. & Luo X. (2022). Simulation study on the investment casting process of a low-cost titanium alloy gearbox based on ProCAST. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 19, 1–10. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4484762.

Malik I., Sani A.A. & Medi A. (2020). Study on using casting simulation software for design and analysis of riser shapes in a solidifying casting component. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1500(1), 012036.

Kishimoto A., Takagawa Y. & Saito T. (2020). Prevention technology of shrinkage using actual casting test and casting simulation. In: H. Okada, S.N. Atluri, Computational and Experimental Simulations in Engineering: Proceedings of ICCES2019. Springer International Publishing, pp. 827–837.

Barot R.P. & Ayar V.S. (2020). Casting simulation and defect identification of geometry varied plates with experimental validation. Materials Today: Proceedings, 26(2), 2754–2762. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.575.

Kang J., Wang J., Shangguan H., Zheng L., Deng C., Hu Y. & Yi J. (2020). Modeling and simulation of the casting process with skeletal sand mold. Materials, 13(7), 1596. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13071596.

Domeij B., Belov I., Fourlakidis V. & Dioszegi A. (2022). Implementation and validation of casting simulation methodology for diagnostics of lamellar graphite iron. International Journal of Metalcasting, 17(3), 1–11. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-022-00892-9.

Haldar P. & Sutradhar G. (2021). Simulation and validation of castings in shop floor. In: Z. Abdallah & N. Aldoumani (Eds.), Casting Processes and Modelling of Metallic Materials. IntechOpen, pp. 53–69, https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/74553.

Hellums J.D. & Churchill S.W. (1962). Transient and steady state, free and natural convection, numerical solutions: Part I. The isothermal, vertical plate. AIChE Journal, 8(5), 690–692. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690080525.

Goldstein R.J. & Briggs D.G. (1964). Transient free convection about vertical plates and circular cylinders. ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 86(4), 490–500. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3688728.

Salmanpour M. & Zonouz O.N. (2008). Numerical comparison of the effect of concave and convex curvatures over the rate of heat transfer from a vertical wall in natural convection flow. Heat Transfer Research, 39(6), 549–558. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1615/HeatTransRes.v39.i6.90.

Bhowmik H., Gharibi A., Yaarubi A. & Alawi N. (2019). Transient natural convection heat transfer analyses from a horizontal cylinder. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 14, 100422. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2019.100422.

Eckert E.R.G. & Jackson T.W. (1950). Analysis of turbulent free-convection boundary layer on flat plate (No. NACA-TN-2207). Washington: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.

Moran W.R. & Lloyd J.R. (1975). Natural convection mass transfer adjacent to vertical and downward-facing inclined surfaces. ASME Journal of Heat and mass Transfer, 97(3), 472–474. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3450404.

Vliet G.C. & Ross D.C. (1975). Turbulent natural convection on upward and downward facing inclined constant heat flux surfaces. ASME Journal of Heat and mass Transfer, 97(4), 549–554. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3450427.

Hrycak P. & Sandman D. . (1986). Radiative and free-convective heat transfer from a finite horizontal plate inside an enclosure. In: 14th Space Simulation Conference: Testing for a Permanent Presence in Space. NASA Conference Publication 2446, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, pp. 42–62.

Fishenden M. & Saunders O.A. (1950)., An Introduction to Heat Transfer. London: Oxford University Press.

Bandyopadhyay K., Oosthuizen P.H. & Li Q. (2023). A numerical study of unsteady natural convection from two-sided thin horizontal isothermal plates. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer (FFHMT’23), paper no. 108. Doi: https://doi.org/10.11159/ffhmt23.108.

Yang K.T. (1987). Natural convection in enclosures. In: S. Kakac, R.K. Shah & W. Aung (Eds.), Handbook of Single-Phase Convective Heat Transfer. New York: John Wiley, pp. 13.1–13.51.

Bauer W., Moldenhauer A. & Platzer A. (2005). Emissivities of ceramic materials for high temperature processes. Optical Diagnostics, 5880, pp. 263–272. SPIE. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.624512.

Jones J.M., Mason P.E. & Williams A. (2019). A compilation of data on the radiant emissivity of some materials at high temperatures. Journal of the Energy Institute, 92(3), 523–534. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2018.04.006.

Hakes S. (2011). How space shuttle technology improves crown emissivity. Glass International, https://www.glass-international.com/content-images/news/FIC.pdf [accessed: 22.11.2023].

Unifrax LLC. (2017). Fiberfrax® Blanket and Mat Products. Product Information Sheet. http://buyinsulationproducts.com/files/126993874.pdf [accessed: 22.11.2023].

Downloads

Published

2024-03-30

How to Cite

Olson, W., Stemmler, M., Fernandez, E., & Kapat, J. (2024). Solidification Process Modeling of Equiaxed Investment Castings with Transient Nonuniform Boundary Condition Definition. Journal of Casting &Amp; Materials Engineering, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.7494/jcme.2024.8.1.1

Issue

Section

Articles